- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2289 MFA No. 4217 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4217 OF 2022 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. V.RAJANNA, S/O. LATE VENKATARAMMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT JAYASHREE RAM CONDIMENTS, ATTIBELE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 107. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. V.ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. ISHWAR H. CHALAWADI, S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. SRI. SURESH Y. SHIRAGUMPI, S/O. YAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.25, GOKUL ROAD, PRIYADARSHINI ROAD COLONY, CHIATANYA NAGAR, HUBLI - 580030. 3. SRI. HARISH REDDY B.N., S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2289 MFA No. 4217 of 2022 4. SRI. SATHISH REDDY B.N., S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT BALLUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562 107. 5. CANARA BANK ARM BRANCH-II, SECOND FLOOR, CIRCLE OFFICE, SPENSORS TOWERS, NO.86, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. REPRESENTED BY HIS BRANCH MANAGER 6. SRI. V.SRINIVASAIAH, S/O. LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 7. SRI. V.CHANDRAPPA S/O. LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 6 AND 7 ARE R/AT ATTIBELE VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562 107 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 14.01.2026, NOTICE TO R5 TO R7 DISPENSED WITH) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2289 MFA No. 4217 of 2022 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.V.Anand, counsel on instruction submits that the appellant is not pressing the present appeal. However, he submits that the plaintiff is aged 75 years and hence, a direction may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. The submission made on behalf of the appellant by counsel for the appellant is placed on record. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. However, taking note of the age of the plaintiff, Trial Court is requested to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible within an outer limit of six months from the receipt of copy of this order. Office is directed to accept the vakalath which would be filed by counsel Sri.K.Vijaya Kumar. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE ss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44