Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 477 (KAR)

MR. SYED ALTAF v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5757/2026 · 2026-03-06

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13660 WP No. 5757 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 5757 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. SYED ALTAF AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SON OF LATE SYED NURUDDEEN, 2. MRS. JABEEN TAJ DAUGHTER OF LATE SYED NURUDDEEN WIFE OF SYED ABRAR AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 3. MRS. FAREEZA BEGUM WIFE OF HABEEBULLA DAUGHTER OF SYED ABRAR AND JABEEN TAJ AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 4. MR. WASEEM AKRAM SON OF SYED ABRAR AND JABEEN TAJ AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 200, 7TH CROSS, 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH BTM LAYOUT, BENGALURU- 560 076. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SRI. KRISHNAPPA.B SON OF BAIRAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 740, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13660 WP No. 5757 of 2026 1ST MAIN, 11TH CROSS, ANASANDRAPALYA EXTENSION, VINAYAKANAGAR, VIMANAPURA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 017. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HELLEN KUSHALAPPA FOR SRI. TAHURA ANZAR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, KANDHAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ANY APPROPRIATE WRIT / DIRECTION/ MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO REGISTER AND ASSIGN A CASE NUMBER TO THE REVENUE APPEAL PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS ON 11.12.2025 UNDER SECTION 136(2) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13660 WP No. 5757 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo stating that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10