Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47698 (CAL)

PRABASH SARKAR AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

/3351/2026 · 2026-10-07

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.10.2026 Item No.112 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.(A) 3351 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Harirampur Police Station Case No. 300 of 2026 dated 27.07.2026 under Sections 85/80/3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Buniadpur, Dakshin Dinajpur. And In the matter of : Prabash Sarkar & Anr. ...… petitioners Mr. Vijay Verma, Advocate Mr. Subrata Saha, Advocate .…for the petitioners Mr. Debajyoti Deb, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate .…for the State 1. Uncles of the victim are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. Husband was taken into custody and granted bail. 3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. Materials in the case diary do not suggest requirement of placing any of the petitioner in custody. 5. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2 6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on condition that petitioners will meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 7. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. 8. CRM(A) 3351 of 2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.08 10:27:37 +05'30'