Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 Sennammal ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Harur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.133 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.133 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.C.Palanisamy For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 103, 118(1), 126(2) and 296(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.133 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that, suspecting the fidelity of the husband of the first accused, the first accused trespassed into the house of the deceased and attacked him with a knife. The specific overt act attributed to the petitioner is that she caught hold of the deceased, thereby facilitating the commission of the offence. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.05.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He would further submit that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 17.06.2026 passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.15224 of 2026, which fact was not seriously disputed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail on the ground of parity. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, fairly submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents and that the investigation has already been completed, though the charge sheet is yet to be filed. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, particularly the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, the fact that the investigation has already been completed though the charge sheet is yet to be filed, the fact that the petitioner is a woman, and also the fact that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 10.07.2026 skr Note: 1. 10.07.2026 skr Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem 3. The Inspector of Police, Harur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.17812 of 2026 10.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis