Ammu v. The State Rep By, its Station House Officer
CRL OP/17845/2026 · 2026-07-10
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 47694 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 47694 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 Ammu ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.118 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.118 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.Sakthivel Bose For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.03.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 194 of the BNSS and subsequently altered to Sections 103(1) and 238(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.118 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the deceased was an alcoholic and, after consuming liquor, used to subject the petitioner to cruelty. Enraged by such conduct, the petitioner allegedly assaulted the deceased, resulting in his death. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.03.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner had committed the act of murder. He would, however, fairly submit that the petitioner has no bad antecedents and that the investigation has already been completed, the final report has been filed, and cognizance has been taken by the jurisdictional Court. 5. Though serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner, considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 the petitioner is a woman, the fact that the petitioner has no bad antecedents, and also the fact that the investigation has already been completed, the final report has been filed, and cognizance has been taken by the jurisdictional Court, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kallakurichi District, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 10.07.2026 skr Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 To
1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kallakurichi District
2.
The Superintendent, Central Prison (Special Prison for Women), Vellore
3. The Inspector of Police, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.17845 of 2026 10.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis