TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD.-GYPSUM, STRUCTURAL INDIA PVT. LTD (JV) v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7677/2025 · 2026-04-16
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4768 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4768 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15938] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7677/2025 Triveni Engineering And Industries Ltd.-Gypsum, Structural India Pvt. Ltd (Jv), A-44, Hoisery Complex, Phase-Ii, Exten., Noida- 201305, U.p, Through Its Authorized Representative Mr. Rajeev Puri S/o Sh. R.p. Puri, Aged 56 Years, Resident Of Nbcc Tower - I, Flat E-13, East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi - 110023. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department. Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Urban Drinking Water. Sewerage And Infrastructure Co-Operation Ltd., Through Its Executive Director, Rudsico, Near Rajasthan Police Hq, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302015
3. Nagar Nigam Jaipur Greater, Through Its Commissioner , Pandit Dindayal Uppadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pratik Kasliwal Mr. Shubham Bhati Ms. Varnali Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General with Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma & Ms. Dhriti Laddha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 16/04/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. The said prayer is made in light of a specific and categorical assurance given by the learned Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the respondent-State. It has been assured that the
[2026:RJ-JP:15938] (2 of 2) [CW-7677/2025] earnest money and the performance bank guarantee pertaining to the contract in dispute shall be duly refunded and returned to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take appropriate recourse, strictly in accordance with the law, should any subsequent cause of action arise or in the event that the aforementioned assurance is not honored by the respondents. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-132