CRM-M-22642- IN THE H (131) JAGDEEP SING STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. H MANISHA BATR 1. The i order dated 23.03 Judge, Sirsa in cas Sections 307, 34 o 186, 182, 211 and District Sirsa, whe State and non-bail fresh non-bailable 2. It is a could not appear previous date of h on 23.03.2026 was are ready to join t -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Gurdarshan S. Sidhu, Advocate f Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by 23.03.2026 passed by the Court of in case arising out of FIR No.357 date 7, 34 of IPC and Section 25 and 27 of 11 and 120B of IPC added later on) a, whereby their bail was cancelled an bailable warrants were ordered to b ble warrants were issued for 06.05.2 It is argued by learned counsel for th ppear before the Learned Trial Co te of hearing, they had noted the date 26 was not intentional but due to the a join the proceedings before the Learn JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-22642-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 05.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA cate for the petitioner led by the petitioners challenging the urt of Learned Additional Sessions 57 dated 10.11.2015 registered under 27 of Arms Act (Sections 195, 353, er on) at Police Station Sadar Sirsa, lled and bonds were forfeited to the ed to be issued against them.. Now 06.05.2026. l for the petitioner that the petitioner al Court on 23.03.2026 as on the e date as 23.04.2026. Their absence o the above-mentioned reason. They Learned Trial Court and to abide by M) 2026 g the sions nder 353, irsa, o the Now ioner the ence They e by AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-22642- the terms and con the petition deserv 3. Notic 4. Learn argued by her that such the same doe 5. This the parties. 6. A per had failed to turn u had cancelled thei Apparently, there therefore, this Cou view the fact that Learned Trial C petitioners to surr and on furnishing by the Learned Tri 7. A cop 05.05.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 2 d conditions to be imposed upon them deserves to be allowed. Notice of motion. Learned State counsel has advance er that there is no illegality or infirmity e does not deserve any interference. This Court has heard the submission A perusal of the record reveals that turn up despite 03:30 pm. Feeling co d their bail and forfeiture of their per there is no illegality or infirmity is Court finds no reason to set aside th ct that the petitioners are ready to jo ial Court, the petition is disposed o o surrender before the Trial Court on ishing fresh as well as personal bonds ed Trial Court. A copy of this order be served throug (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No them. It is, therefore, argued that vance notice of the petition. It is firmity in the impugned order and as e. ission made by learned counsel for s that on 23.03.2026, the petitioners ling constrained, learned Trial Court personal as well as surety bonds. irmity in the impugned order and side the same. However, keeping in to join the proceedings before the sed of by giving direction to the on 06.05.2026 and on doing so bonds, they shall be admitted to bail through Bench Secretary. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No es/No that It is nd as l for ners ourt onds. and ng in e the the g so bail AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.