- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2288 MFA No. 2876 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2876 OF 2021 (AA) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. JAYALAKSHMI VISHWANATH K AMIN W/O VISHWANATH KANKANADY AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS SHARADA RESIDENCY NEAR CANARA BANK APARTMENT OPPOSITE SAIBABA MANDIR CHILIMBI, LADY HILL MANGALURU - 575 006. 2. MS. HITHA VISHWANATH AMIN D/O LATE VISHWANTH AMIN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS SHARADA RESIDENCY NEAR CANARA BANK APARTMENT OPPOSITE SAIBABA MANDIR CHILIMBI, LADY HILL MANGALURU - 575 006 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER MRS. JAYALAKSHMI VISHWANATHA K AMIN 3. MR. RAJNEESH AMIN (WRONGLY SHOWN AS RAJANISH AMIN IN A.A. NO.8/2020) S/O LATE VISHWANATH AMIN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS SHARADA RESIDENCY NEAR CANARA BANK APARTMENT, OPPOSITE SAIBABA MANDIR CHILIMBI, LADY HILL MANGALURU - 575 006. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2288 MFA No. 2876 of 2021 4. MR. SUSHANTH AMIN S/O LATE VISHWANATH AMIN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS SHARADA RESIDENCY NEAR CANARA BANK APARTMENT, OPPOSITE SAIBABA MANDIR CHILIMBI LADY HILL MANGALURU - 575 006 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER MRS. JAYALAKSHMI VISHWANATH K AMIN …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. N.NANDITA DAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ANANDARAMA K., ADVOCATE) AND: MR. HARISH KUMAR KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O KOKKARNE KRISHNA PARTNER M/S KUDLA PROPERTIES LLP PERMANENT RESIDENCE OF DOOR NO. 1-165, MYLAR MISSION COMPOUND MATADAKANI ROAD, BOCCAPATNA MANGALORE AND NOW R/AT SUJATHA RESIDENCY, ALAPE VILLAGE,, PADIL, MANGALURU - 575 007 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.UDAYASHANKAR RAI, ADVOCATE) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(b) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2288 MFA No. 2876 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT Smt.N.Nandita Das, counsel on behalf of Sri.Anandarama K., counsel for the appellant appeared in person. Counsel for appellants submits that a memo has been filed stating the appeal may be disposed of as the same does not survive for consideration. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about disposal of the appeal as it does not survive for consideration. Submission is noted. The memo is placed on record. Resultantly, the appeal is disposed of as it does not survive for consideration. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65