Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47664 (CAL)

NARAYAN CHANDRA DEY AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26261/2026 · 2026-09-29

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.09.2026 Sl. No.35 Ct. No.14 ss IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No.26261 of 2026 Narayan Chandra Dey & ors. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sourav Mitra Ms. Sreyasree Choudhury Ms. Jonaki Saha … for the petitioner Mr. Sourav Sengupta Ms. Sneha Chatterjee … for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Mr. Sourav Mitra, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that there are inadvertent typographical errors in the pleadings of the writ petition. He seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 3. Despite service none appears on behalf of the State. 4. Mr. Sourav Sengupta, learned Advocate who usually appears on behalf of the State is requested to appear in this matter with junior of his choice. Let their appointment be regularized by the competent authority. 5. In view of the above submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition being no. W.P.A. 26261 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 7. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 2 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)