Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47651 (CAL)

TARIKUL MOLLA AND ANR. v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/23624/2026 · 2026-10-07

Ajay Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.10.2026 Sl. No. 332 Ct. No. 39 Srimanta IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/23624/2026 In Re: TARIKUL MOLLA & ANR. Mr. Romit Dutta …for the petitioners. Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the E.C.I. Mr. Brijendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Sarthak Barman ...for the State. 1. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners prays for expeditious disposal of the SIR Appeal pending before the SIR Tribunal. 2. Having heard the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties, it appears that the prayer is simple and innocuous and there is no impediment to passing such order. 3. Accordingly, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the SIR Appeal preferred by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. 4. It is needless to mention that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and the same 2 may be decided independently and in accordance with law without being influenced by any observations made by this court. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties taking all legal formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)