Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4765 (AP)

Karamala Venkatarami Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17892/2026 · 2026-07-06

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading : 10.07.2026 APHC010327022026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17892/2026 Between: 1. KARAMALA VENKATARAMI REDDY, S/O VENKATARAMI REDDY, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O NEAR SUBBIREDDY COLLEGE, SRINIVASA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SIRISALA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O NAGAIAH, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC COOLIE, R/O HNO 5/509, RAVINDRA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. DANDU SREENIVASULU @ SANA, S/O NARASIMHULU LATE, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O HNO 15/97, BANDLAMITTA ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR-522501.. 2. SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA -516001. 3. SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KADAPA DIVISION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516001. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516001. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Suspect Sheet Rc.No. 24/R.S/SDPO- KDP/2023 dated 24.04.2023 on the file of the respondents 4 and 5 police stations against the petitioners as illegal, irregular, irrational and arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos 4 and 5 not to harass the petitioners by calling them repeatedly to the respondent 4 and 5 police stations, without appropriate notice or proceeding and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent Nos: 4 and 5 not to harass the petitioners by calling them repeatedly to the respondent 4 and 5 police stations, without appropriate notice or proceeding, pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M SOLOMON RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17892/2026 The Court made the following O R D E R : Mr. M. Solomon Raju, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 07.07.2026 krk THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 105 WRIT PETITION NO: 17892/2026 krk 07.07.2026