Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4455 RSA No. 717 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 717 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
H. S. JAYAKUMARA S/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED 55 YEARS HANJAGODANAHALLI VILLAGE HANUBALU HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK …APPELLANT (BY SMT.SHARADAMBA A.R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: PRASANNA S/O BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS HANJAGODANAHALI VILLAGE HANUBALU HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA TALUK …RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.02.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN IN R.A.NO.6/2022 DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT THEREBY CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPURA, IN O.S.NO.56/2018 AND ETC.,
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4455 RSA No. 717 of 2024
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 51