Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4764 (MAD)

Vijayakumar v. The Sub-Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/11637/2026 · 2026-05-06

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 11637 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-05-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL OP No. 11637 of 2026 1. Vijayakumar S/o.Venkatesan, No.27, Sanathi Street, Arni, Tiruvannamalai District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Katpadi Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No.53/2026 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime.No.53/2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.03.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 111, 304(2) & 317(5) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.53 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other co- accused have involved in chain snatching and the petitioner has melted the stolen gold jewels and sold the same and handed over to the co-accused. Hence, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11637 of 2026 the complaint. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody from 21.03.2026. Hence, seeks for bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that petitioner along with other co-accused have involved in chain snatching and the petitioner has melted the stolen gold jewels and sold the same and handed over to the co-accused. If the petitioner is released on bail, there is every likelihood that he may abscond, tamper with witness and indulge in similar offence. Hence, vehemently opposed the bail. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, nature and gravity of offences, the manner in which the offence alleged to have taken place, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed. 06-05-2026 dhk To 1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Katpadi Police Station, Vellore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11637 of 2026 Crime No.53/2026 2.The Judicial Magistrate Katpadi 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore 4.The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 11637 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI J. dhk CRL OP No. 11637 of 2026 06-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis