Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4764 (CAL)

SANJAY BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/652/2026 · 2026-04-01

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01/04/2026 D/L – 49 Court No.28 S. Kundu Rejected C.R.M.(A) 652 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Bizpur P.S case no. 183 of 2025 dated 07/09/2025 under sections 21(c) of the NDPS Act. In the matter of: Sanjay Biswas ...Petitioner. Mr. Debasish Kar Mr. Husen Mustafi Ms. Suhana Parvin …for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Mr. Subham Bhakat …for the State. 1. Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The only material available against the petitioner is the statement of the co-accused. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that other than the statement of the co-accused, there are two criminal antecedents of the petitioner apart from the present case, one of which is under the provisions of the NDPS Act where a charge sheet has been submitted. 4. Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)