Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47624 (CAL)

LITON SK. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/2026/2026 · 2026-10-08

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 D/L 16 08.10.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.33 Allowed IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2026 of 2026 Liton Sk. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sessions Case No. 60 of 2023 arising out of Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 501 of 2022 dated 22.07.2022 under Sections 498(A)/447/323/325/326/307/506/302/34 of the IPC. And In the matter of : Liton Sk. …Petitioner. Mr. Mritunjoy Chatterjee Mr. Arka Roy Mr. Debarnab Adhikary …for the Petitioner Mr. Subhas Chandra Saha Ms. Deblina Bhattacharjee …for the State 1. Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted the earlier bail petition being CRM (DB) No. 417 of 2023 had been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 3rd February, 2023. The present petitioner had been in custody for 193 days. It was further submitted on 08.07.2026 two co- accused persons were granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM (M) 1150 of 2026. 2. The learned Advocate representing the State submitted out of 17 witnesses, 15 witnesses had already been examined. 3. Considering the stage of trial and the co-accused persons to have been granted bail by this Court the present petitioner is favourably considered. 4. As such prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 2 5. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Liton Sk. shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh, Murshidabad. 6. The petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition the petitioner shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station once in a week until further orders. 7. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial Court without justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this Court. 8. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2026 of 2026 is allowed. 9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)