Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4762 (KAR)

SRI.V.K.LINGA REDDY v. BANK OF BARODA

WP/804/2022 · 2026-04-17

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21343 WP No. 804 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 804 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI.V.K.LINGA REDDY S/O K.V.KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O VARADAHALLI, JATAHAVARA POST, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 101. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. KALLESHAPPA K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANK OF BARODA (ERSTWHILE DENA BANK), PATRENAHALLI BRANCH, PATRENAHALLI-562 101 CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER-1 DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1, JEEVAN MANGAL BUILDING, II FLOOR,NO.4, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025 3. SRI.LOKESH V P S/O PAPANNA, AGED 29 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21343 WP No. 804 of 2022 R/O VARADAHALLI, JATAHAVARA POST, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 101. 4. SRI.ANANDARAM L., S/O LAXMINARAYANAPPA, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O VARADAHALLI, JATAHAVARA POST, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 101 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P.MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2 TO R4 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY DATED 02.12.2021 ISSUED BY R2 RECOVERY OFFICER IN R.C.NO.277/2021 IN O.A.NO.535/2020 AS PER ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR 8DISMISSAL9, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 8dismissal9. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21343 WP No. 804 of 2022 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/Bank submits that the account is closed, hence nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20