- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5821 CA No. 46 of 2025 A/W CA 393 of 2025 IN COP No. 103 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2025 A/W COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 393 OF 2025 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 103 OF 2014 IN CA NO. 46 OF 2025 BETWEEN: OMNESYS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED BENGALURU …APPLICANT (BY SRI. MILIND DONGE., AGA) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER FOR STAMPS BENGALURU …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. MURALI J. SAGAR., ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC R/W SECTION 6 AND 9 OF COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959 PRAYING TO, REOPEN THE ABOVE CASE BY RECALLING THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2024, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5821 CA No. 46 of 2025 A/W CA 393 of 2025 IN COP No. 103 of 2014 IN CA NO.393 OF 2025 BETWEEN: OMNESYS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED BENGALURU …APPLICANT (BY SRI. MILIND DONGE., AGA) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER FOR STAMPS BENGALURU …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. MURALI J. SAGAR., ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 PRAYING TO CONDONE THE DELAY OF 366 DAYS IN FILING THE ABOVE APPEAL, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THESE COMPANY APPLICATIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. CA No.46/2025 has been filed seeking for the following reliefs: Pleased to reopen the above case by recalling the order dated 28.03.2024, in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5821 CA No. 46 of 2025 A/W CA 393 of 2025 IN COP No. 103 of 2014 2. CA No.393/2025 has been filed seeking for the following reliefs; Pleased to condone the delay of 366 days in filing the above appeal, in the interests of justice and equity. 3. What is essentially sought for is recalling the order dated 28.03.2024 which had been passed after hearing both the counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. When an order has been passed on merits, an application for recall of the order is not permissible. In that view, CA No.46/2025 stands dismissed. 4. CA No.393/2025 for condonation of delay stands disposed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: Sl No.: