1 2026:CGHC:14596 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2799 of 2026 1 - Ashish Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shivsharan Jaiswal Aged About 39 Years Resident Ward No. 03, Tikaripara, Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur, C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Neer Bhawan, Main Road Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief Public Health Engineering Department, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Superintending Engineer Public Health Engineering Division, Office Near Nag- Nagin Pond, In Front Of Pratham Hospital, Bahtrai Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer Public Health Engineering Department Block Bilaspur, Old Composite Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector- Bilaspur Collectorate, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pensions- Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Yash Verma, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 27/03/2026 2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employee is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submits representation, his claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off with aforesaid observation and direction. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY