Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47580 (MAD)

Thangaraj v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl.(MD)/2993/2026 · 2026-07-01

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2993 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2993 of 2026 & W.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.866 of 2026 Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. State of Tamilnadu, Rep by Inspector of Police, Neikkarapatti Police Station, Dindigul. 3. M.Balasubramanian ... Respondents (R3 is impleaded vide order of this Court dated 01.07.2026 in WMP(MD)NO. 866 of 2026.) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 24.05.2026 and conduct enquiry and act in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Yogeswaran For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy (R1 & R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.J.Poovenerarajan (R3) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2993 of 2026 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 24.05.2026 and conduct enquiry and act in accordance with law. 2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit in the writ miscellaneous petition, W.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.866 of 2026 is ordered. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint seeking appropriate action against the third respondent, alleging that the third respondent had criminally intimidated the petitioner with the intention of driving him out of his grove. However, as no effective action was taken on the said complaint, the present petition came to be filed. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2993 of 2026 24.05.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 01.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm TO:- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Neikkarapatti Police Station, Dindigul. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2993 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2993 of 2026 Dated 01.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis