Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47580 (KAR)

SMT.MAADALAMBIKE v. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

WP/10924/2022 · 2026-02-02

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5631 WP No. 10924 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.10924 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MAADALAMBIKE D/O LATE B.P. SHIVASHANKARAPPA, W/O MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O NO.33, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 13TH CROSS, KOGILU ROAD, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BABU RAO M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, 13TH FLOOR, VISVESHWARAYA BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. B.S. GURU PRASAD S/O LATE B.P. SHIVASHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT BETTALASURU VILLAGE AND POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT- 562 157. 3. SRI. B.S. MAHESHA S/O LATE B.P. SHIVASHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT BETTALASURU VILLAGE AND POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 157. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1) Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5631 WP No. 10924 of 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1-DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY TO IMMEDIATELY ADD/GRANT THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN LEASE LICENSE NOS.2327 AND 2581 ISSUED/ RENEWED IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is with regard to add/grant the name of the petitioner in the lease licence Nos.2327 and 2581 issued/renewed in favour of respondents 2 and 3. 2. Heard Sri. Babu Rao M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1. 3. Since, there is no demand by the petitioner and refusal by the respondent-Authority in respect of relief sought for in this writ petition, it is open for the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent No.1 within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. If such a representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered by the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5631 WP No. 10924 of 2022 respondent No.1 in accordance with law, within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of representation that may be made by the petitioner. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4