- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5440 WP No. 10970 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10970 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KEMPANNA @ KEMPAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS., SRI. NARAYANAPPA, S/O LATE KEMPANNA @ KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2. SRI. MANJUNATHA SWAMY K. S/O LATE KEMPANNA @ KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 3. SRI. MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY K. S/O LATE KEMPANNA @ KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KODAGALAHATTI VILLAGE, HUNASEMARANAHALLI POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562 157. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5440 WP No. 10970 of 2025 K G ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, EARLIER YALAHANKA TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 4. SMT. SHAKUNTHALAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 5. SMT. KEERTHANA D. D/O LATE DEVARAJ AND SHAKUNTHALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 6. SRI. ABHILASH D. S/O LATE DEVARAJ AND SHAKUNTHALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. PRASHANTH L. KANAL, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: (A) QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.03.2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN R.P.NO.20/2024 (ANNEXURE-A); AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5440 WP No. 10970 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo along with documents where it is stated that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed since their names are entered in the revenue records pursuant to the registered sale deeds. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. 2. Memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22