Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47553 (KAR)

MR. RAMALINGU v. MR. LINGARAJU

RSA/835/2023 · 2026-01-29

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5044 RSA No. 835 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 835 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: MR. RAMALINGU S/O LT MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS NO 328, 5TH CROSS MODINASAB GALLI NAZARBAD, MYSURU 570 010. …APPELLANT (BY SRI BALAJI RAGHUNATHAN, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: MR. LINGARAJU S/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH NO.328, 5TH CROSS MODINSAB GALLI NAZARBAD, MYSURU 570 010. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2022 PASSED IN RA NO.5032/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA (SITTING AT SRIRANGAPATNA) DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.04.2019 PASSED IN OS NO. 66/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE SRIRANGAPATNA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDERS WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5044 RSA No. 835 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 6th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE PSG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19