Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47547 (MAD)

D.Chandran v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Vallam

CRL OP(MD)/13056/2026 · 2026-07-02

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.OP.(MD)No.13056 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL.OP.(MD)No.13056 of 2026 and CRL.MP.(MD)Nos.12812 & 12813 of 2026 D.Chandran ... Petitioner Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Vallam Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.246/2024) 2.Ramesh ... Respondents PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records in C.C.No.310 of 2026 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court-II, Thanjavur and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For R1 : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh, Government Advocate(Crl.side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.13056 of 2026 ORDER Present criminal original petition has been filed by the sole accused in C.C.No.310 of 2026 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court-II, Thanjavur, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner has been charged for the offence under Sections 420, 468 & 477 IPC. 2.A perusal of charge sheet reveals that the petitioner is said to have created a forged possession certificate as if it has been issued by the Tahsildar. 3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Tahsildar has given a statement to the effect that they are not able to trace the documents and in such circumstances that would not amount to forgery. 4.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the available materials on record. 5.As it could be seen from the charge sheet, specific allegations are made as against the petitioner that possession certificate said to have been issued by the Tahsildar is not supported by documents and a certificate to 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.13056 of 2026 that effect has also been issued. In such circumstances, prima facie case is made out as against the petitioner and therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. The trial Court is expected to dispose the criminal proceedings on merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by anyone of the observations made. The personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with unless specifically directed by the Trial Court. 6.There are no merits in this criminal original petition and the same stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. NCC : Yes/No 02.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No gns To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court-II, Thanjavur 2.The Inspector of Police, Vallam Police Station, Thanjavur District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.13056 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J . gns CRL.OP.(MD)No.13056 of 2026 02.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis