Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47535 (CAL)

APURBA PAYRA AND ANR. v. SURBHI SINGLA, SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KHARAGPUR AND ANR.

WPCRC/231/2026 · 2026-10-06

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Ct.19 06.10.26 Item No.7 Sws.M WPCRC 231 of 2026 Apurba Payra and Anr. Vs Surbhi Singla, Sub-Divisional Officer, Kharagpur and Anr. in WPA 6948 of 2025 Apurba Payra and Anr. Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Dibasish Basu Ms. Sneha dutta Mr. Purnendu Das ….for the State 1. None appears on behalf of the writ petitioners/applicants. 2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the alleged contemnors are present. The contemnors are however absent. On behalf of the contemnors, a compliance report dated 02.10.2026 is filed today which is taken on record. 3. It is submitted that from the compliance report dated 02.10.2026 it would reveal that the PWD authority has cleared the obstruction as shown by the petitioners. It is further submitted that the compliance report also Pbears the counter signature of the writ petitioners. 2 4. Such being the position, this Court finds nothing remains to be decided in the instant contempt application. 5. With the aforementioned observation, the instant contempt application is disposed of. 6. The Rule, as issued against the contemnors is/are discharged. (Partha Sarathi Sen , J.)