Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47529 (CAL)

NURITAN BIBI v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/18510/2026 · 2026-10-07

Uday Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L – 64 07/10/2026 Court. No. 42 S.Kundu WPA 18510 of 2026 Nuritan Bibi Vs. The Election of Commission of India & Ors. Mr. Nurnobi Seikh …for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the ECI. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having EPIC No. WPL2198331 has preferred an appeal against deletion of name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal. 3. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the appeal. 4. Learned counsel for the Election of India submits that huge number of appeals before the learned Appellate Tribunal, which are being disposed of on a day to day basis. 5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. 2 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Uday Kumar, J.)