07.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 22. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (A) 3637 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 413 of 2025 dated 11.05.2025 under sections 109/117(2)/118(2)/3(5) of the BNS. And In the matter of : Tapas Dey ……Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay Mr. Manjeet Saha Mr. Subhrajyoti Das ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Koustav Bagchi Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi ….for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely foisted with the present criminal case with distortion of facts. State has opposed the prayer. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary. On an overall assessment of the facts of the case including the complicity of the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that a case for anticipatory bail has not been made out. 2 Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail in CRM (A) 3637 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)