ON THE DEATH OF MAYUR UDDIN MAZUMDER, v. ON THE DEATH OF RAKESH CHANDRA DEY
I.A.(Civil)/637/2024 · 2026-04-21
Kaushik Goswami
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4752 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4752 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010292862023
2026:GAU-AS:5502
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/637/2024 ON THE DEATH OF MAYUR UDDIN MAZUMDER HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1.1: NURJAN MAZUMDER W/O LATE MAYUR UDDIN MAZUMDER R/O VILL. RAJPATH RONGPUR PART-IV DIST. CACHAR ASSAM 1.2: SHAHIDA AKTAR LASKAR D/O LATE MAYUR UDDIN MAZUMDER W/O AJIJ AHMED LASKAR R/O VILL. AND P.O. SAIDPUR PART-II DIST. CACHAR ASSAM 1.3: SAHINA AKTAR BARBHUIYA D/O LATE MAYUR UDDIN MAZUMDER W/O BADRUL ISLAM BARBHUIYA R/O VTC SAIDPUR PART-II P.O. SAIDPUR PART-II DIST. CACHAR ASSAM 1.4: REHIMA AKTAR MAZUMDER D/O LATE MAYUR UDDIN MAZUMDER
Page No.# 2/6 R/O VILL. RAJPATH RONGPUR PART-IV DIST. CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF RAKESH CHANDRA DEY HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS.
1.1:RAKHAL RANJAN DEY S/O LT. RAKESH CHANDRA DEY R/O VIVEKANANDA ROAD SILCHAR P.S.-BARAKPUR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788007 1.2:SMTI REKHASHREE DEY W/O AMULYA CHANDRA DEY R/O VIVEKANANDA ROAD SILCHAR P.S.-BARAKPUR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788007 1.3:SMTI. RATNA DHAR W/O AMULYA DHAR R/O GOBARDHANPARA GUWAHATI DIST-KAMRUP(M) 1.4:SMTI. RUPASHREE DY W/O AMAR DEY R/O GONGAPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 1.5:RAKHI DUTTA W/O SAMBHU DUTTA R/O SALGANGA PARGANA UDHARBOND DIST-CACHAR ASSAM
Page No.# 3/6 PIN-788031 2:ON THE DEATH OF ANNANDA MOHAN DEY HIS LEGAL HEIRS 2.1:KHELA RANI DEY W/O LT. ANNANDA MOHAN DEY R/O SANTIPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPUR DIST-CACHAR PIN-788009 2.2:AJOY DEY S/O LT. ANNANDA MOHAN DEY R/O SANTIPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPUR DIST-CACHAR PIN-788009 3:ON THE DEATH OF NIRESH CHANDRA DEY HIS LEGAL HEIRS 3.1:SMTI. MIRA DEY W/O LT. NIRESH CHANDRA DEY R/O SANTIPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPUR P.S.-SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788009 3.2:NILANJAN DEY S/O LT. NIRESH CHANDRA DEY R/O SANTIPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPUR P.S.-SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788009 3.3:DIPANJAN DEY S/O LT. NIRESH CHANDRA DEY
Page No.# 4/6 R/O SANTIPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPUR P.S.-SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788009 3.4:SMTI. NIRA DEY D/O LT. NIRESH CHANDRA DEY R/O SANTIPARA RONGPUR PART-IV PARGANA BARAKPUR P.S.-SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788009 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A ISLAM Advocate for : appearing for ON THE DEATH OF RAKESH CHANDRA DEY
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
ORDER 22.04.2026 Heard Mr. L R Mazumder, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Ms. S C Murtaza, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. R Choudhury,
learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The present interlocutory application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking
Page No.# 5/6 substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant in the connected RSA No. 76/2021. It appears from the materials placed on record that during the pendency of the connected RSA No. 76/2021, the appellant, Mayur Uddin Mazumder, expired on 29.04.2023, leaving behind the following legal heirs:
1. Nurjan Mazumder – Widow
2. Shahida Aktar Laskar – Daughter
3. Sahina Aktar Barbhuiya – Daughter
4. Rehima Aktar Mazumder – Daughter Since the aforesaid persons are stated to be the legal representatives of the appellant and their presence is necessary for the just and proper adjudication of the connected appeal, this Court finds sufficient grounds to allow the prayer for substitution. Accordingly, the application stands allowed. The following persons shall be substituted in place of the deceased appellant, Mayur Uddin Mazumder:
1. Nurjan Mazumder
2. Shahida Aktar Laskar
3. Sahina Aktar Barbhuiya
4. Rehima Aktar Mazumder The applicants shall file an amended cause title before the Registry within the prescribed time for carrying out the necessary corrections. With the above directions, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.
Page No.# 6/6
JUDGE Comparing Assistant