Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11123 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.11123 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.11178 and 11180 of 2026 1. Ragu @ Raguvaran 2. Ramu 3. Muthukaruppan 4. Hari 5. Sivabatham 6. Iyyappan 7. Pirnesh 8. Sathiyaseelan @ Dharmaseelan 9. Seenivasan @ Seeni 10. Rakkappan @ Mahalingam 11. Tamil @ Tamil Selvan 12. Ranjith @ Ranjith Kumar 13. Saravanan @ Saravanakumar 14. Ulagam @ Ulaganathan 15. Ruthiramoorthy @ Uruthiramoorthi 16. Rajivgandhi 17. Sivadoss 18. Sekar 19. Ramu 20. Ramkumar ... Petitioners/ Accused No.1 to 20 (Petitioners 10,12 and 15 are amended vide order of this Court dated 29.06.2026 in Crl.M.P (MD) No.12573 of 2026 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.11123 of 2026) 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11123 of 2026 Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Mimisal Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (In Crime No.139 of 2017) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant 2. Ayup Khan ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for records culminating into a Sessions Case in S.C.No.171 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Pudukkottai and till the disposal of the quash petition. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Karthikeyan For R1 : Mr.B.Arun Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.G.Manikandan ORDER The present petition has been filed by A1 to A20 in S.C.No.171 of 2025, on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioners are charged with the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2), 379, 307 and 149 of 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11123 of 2026 IPC, r/w.Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992 and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002. 2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the petitioners are said to have attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries to him. The statement of the Doctor under Section 161 of Cr.P.C, reveals that the injuries are simple in nature and in such circumstances Section 307 of IPC does not get attracted but only Section 326 of IPC gets attracted. 3. Pending trial, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. 4.Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. 5. Considering the above said facts, charge sheet in S.C.No.171 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, is hereby quashed. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11123 of 2026 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 29.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No 2/2 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi To 1. The Principal District Court, Pudukkottai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mimisal Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11123 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.11123 of 2026 29.06.2026 2/2 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis