Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4750 (RAJ)

RAMSIYA W/O LATE NARESH JAGA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1243/2026 · 2026-04-16

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15968] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1243/2026 Ramsiya W/o Late Naresh Jaga, Resident of Padli, Bhadlav, Sawai Madhopur, Presently Resident of 72-A, Kailashpuri, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj). ----Complainant-Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur. 4. SHO Police Station Muhana, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 16/04/2026 No one is present on behalf of petitioner-complainant even in the second round. The petitioner-complainant has preferred this criminal miscellaneous petition seeking fair investigation. A complaint has been filed by the complainant before the concerned Court which was forwarded under Section 175(3) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita ("BNSS") to the concerned police station whereupon the present FIR came to be registered. Heard learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. [2026:RJ-JP:15968] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1243/2026] Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., AIR 2008 SC 907 has held that the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR and to ensure a proper investigation and for this purpose, he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly. The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of BNSS simply because a person has a grievance that after registration of FIR, proper investigation has not been done by the police. In view of above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the criminal miscellaneous petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the concerned Magistrate for redressing his grievance. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /27