DANTHULURI RAMAKRISHNA VINOBHA RAJU v. The state of Andhra Pradesh
WP/40420/2022 · 2026-07-06
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4750 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4750 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010682682022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 40420/2022 Between:
1. DANTHULURI RAMAKRISHNA VINOBHA RAJU, S/O. LATE BUCHI VENKATAPATHI RAJU
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
R/O 68-10A-21, RAJESWARI NAGAR, GAIGOLUPADU, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , ANAKAPALLY DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, NAKKAPALLI MANDAL, ANKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, GUNUPUDI VILLAGE, NAKKAPALLI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. DANTHULURI RAMESH RAJU, S/O VARAHA NARASIMHA RAJU, R/O PAIYAKARAO PETA, MANDAL, GOPLAPATNAM VILLAGE,ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 6. DANTHULURI GOPINATH, S/O SATYANARAYANA RAJU, R/O PAIYAKARAO PETA, MANDAL, GOPLAPATNAM
VILLAGE,ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction of the Respondents to admeasuring Ac.12-14 cents in Sy.No.77 and Ac.7-40 Cents in Sy.No.78 total Ac.19-54 Cents situated at Gunupudi Village, Nakkapally Mandal, Ankapalli District is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the article 14. 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and also against the principles of natural justice and also against the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights Act and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to make the corrections in revenue records by deleting the name of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 by considering the representation of the Petitioner dt.11.11.2022 and entered the name of Petitioner in Revenue records and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the Petitioner dt.11.11.2022 and mutate the name of Petitioner in Revenue records pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V V S VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2.
VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY
The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 07.07.2026 BRS
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No