- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3628 RSA No. 956 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 956 OF 2008 (PAR) BETWEEN: YESHODAMMA, D/O. A.KANAKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT OLD MILK DAIRY ROAD, KATARIPALYA, KOLAR CITY-563 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.NARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.N.UMESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.N.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MUNIRATHNAMMA D/O A.KANAKAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT KATHA NO.448, NEAR HOUSE OF ADVOCATE SUBBAREDDY, GOWRIPET, KOLAR-563 101 2. JAYAMMA, D/O. A.KANAKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT PATTANDURU AGRAHARA, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU SOUTH. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.S.VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 24.08.2010, NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3628 RSA No. 956 of 2008 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. M.S.Varadarajan, counsel for respondent No.1 appeared in person. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the appeal was listed on 11.07.2025, on that also there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, but the counsel for respondent No.1 was present. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 3 Sl No.: 9