Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4749 (GAU)

SUSHILA TALUKDAR AND 2 ORS. v. SAMITA RABHA AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3724/2024 · 2026-04-20

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010237162024 2026:GAU-AS:5446 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3724/2024 SUSHILA TALUKDAR AND 2 ORS. W/O- LATE AMIYA TALUKDAR, R/O- VILL.- PANERI, P.O. AND P.S. PANERI, MOUZA- HARISINGA, DIST. UDALGURI, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 781123. VERSUS SAMITA RABHA AND 2 ORS W/O- SRI BINOD RABHA @ RAVA, R/O- VILL.- PANERI, P.O. AND P.S. PANERI, MOUZA- HARISINGA, DIST. UDALGURI, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 781123. Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M M DAS, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A R SHOME, In CRP(IO)/325/2024 SAMITA RABHA AND 2 ORS. W/O- SRI BINOD RABHA @ RAVA R/O- VILL.- PANERI P.O. AND P.S. PANERI MOUZA- HARISINGA DIST. UDALGURI BTR ASSAM PIN- 781123. Page No.# 2/3 2: BINOD RABHA @ RAVA S/O- LATE KANTI RAM RABHA R/O- VILL.- PANERI P.O. AND P.S. PANERI MOUZA- HARISINGA DIST. UDALGURI BTR ASSAM PIN- 781123. 3: JYOTI PRAKASH RABHA S/O- SRI BINOD RABHA @ RAVA R/O- VILL.- PANERI P.O. AND P.S. PANERI MOUZA- HARISINGA DIST. UDALGURI BTR ASSAM PIN- 781123. VERSUS SUSHILA TALUKDAR AND 2 ORS. W/O- LATE AMIYA TALUKDAR R/O- VILL.- PANERI P.O. AND P.S. PANERI MOUZA- HARISINGA DIST. UDALGURI BTR ASSAM PIN- 781123. 2:AMARESH TALUKDAR S/O- LATE AMIYA TALUKDAR R/O- VILL.- PANERI P.O. AND P.S. PANERI MOUZA- HARISINGA DIST. UDALGURI BTR ASSAM PIN- 781123. 3:ABINASH TALUKDAR S/O- LATE AMIYA TALUKDAR R/O- VILL.- PANERI P.O. AND P.S. PANERI MOUZA- HARISINGA DIST. UDALGURI BTR Page No.# 3/3 ASSAM PIN- 781123. ------------ Advocate for : MR. S CHAUHAN Advocate for : MR. K N CHOUDHURY (R- 1 TO 3) appearing for SUSHILA TALUKDAR AND 2 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 21.04.2026 In view of the Judgment and Order dated 21.04.2026, passed in CRP(IO) Case No. 325 of 2024, this Interlocutory Application (Civil) is, accordingly, dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant