Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010183672018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 7960/2018 Between: 1. KILARI GOPAL RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS OCC. FARMER, R/O. DOOR.NO. 2-16, BALEMARRU VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KILARI SURESH KUMAR, S/O. KILARI GOPAL RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC. FARMER, R/O. DOOR.NO. 2-16, BALEMARRU VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATI, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KROSURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. N DURGESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED MAJOR, OCC. TAHSILDAR, KROSURU, MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KILARI RAVI KUMAR, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC.GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO. 11-407/2, 2ND LANE, PANDURANGA NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 VS,J W.P.No.7960 of 2018 6. KILARI JAHNAVI, D/O. KILARI RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL FATHER RESPONDENT NO.4 KILARI RAVI KUMAR R/O. H.NO. 11-407/2, 2ND LANE, PANDURANGA NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned Notice titled as ENDORSEMENT dt. 03-03-2018 by the respondent No.3 without any jurisdiction and directing the Panchayath secretary of Balemarru Village, Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District to inform the villagers through TOMTOM and that the village assistant publicized the same in the village through TOMTOM and also affixed the impugned notice in the panchayat office and other prominent places of the village as highly illegal, arbitrary, un constitutional in law and volatile articles 14, 21 and 22 of the constitution of India and consequntly quash Notice titled as ENDORSEMENT dt. 03-03-2018 issued by the respondent No.3 and to pass may think deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondets not to proceed further in persuance of the Notice titled as ENDORSEMENT dt. 03-03-2018 issued by the respondent No.3 forth with pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. LASETTY RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. MARELLA RADHA 3. SHAIK KARIMULLA 3 VS,J W.P.No.7960 of 2018 The Court made the following: ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 23.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioners, as such, the matter was directed to be posted to 30.06.2026. Even on 30.06.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was posted to 07.07.2026, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 07.07.2026 Gss Whether the order is : Speaking No Reportable No