Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47469 (KAR)

SRI. RANGADAMAIAH @ RANGADAMAPPA v. SRI ABBANNA

WP/12458/2024 · 2026-01-07

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:924 WP No. 12458 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 12458 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RANGADAMAIAH @ RANGADAMAPPA S/O MUNIYELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 2. SRI SOMASHEKAR S/O RANGADAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS ALL ATHE ABOVE PETITIONERS ARE R/A DOMMALURU VILLAGE LAKKUR HOBLI HULIMANGALA HOSAKOTE POST MALURU TALUK KOLARA DISTRICT-563160 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R HEMANTH RAJ., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI ABBANNA S/O LATE GUNGANNA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/A BARAGURU VILLAGE HULIMANGALA HOSAKOTE POST LAKKUR HOBLI MALURU TLAUK KOLARA DISTRICT-563160 Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:924 WP No. 12458 of 2024 2. THE THASILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK HOSAKOTE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562114 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION DODDABALLAPURA-561203 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BHAVAN 1ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE KUNDANAHOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY C/R1., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 14.10.2022 PASSED BY THE R-3 AC, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION IN CASE NO. R.A (Ho) 237/2020 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-C IN THE WP AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 08.12.2025 the following order was passed: “A week’s time is granted finally for necessary compliance. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:924 WP No. 12458 of 2024 If office objections are not complied with, list this matter in ‘orders’ list for dismissal on 17.12.2025. 2. Office objections have not been complied with. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL