- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:932 RFA No. 1081 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1081 OF 2020 (INJ-) BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O SRI P. NANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 2938, 14TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD K R ROAD, BSK 2ND STAGE BENGALURU – 560 062 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NITHIN B.M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRACHUD A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKALAKSHMAIAH @ LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS 2. SRI ANJANAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKALAKSHMAIAH @ LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT HARI NAGAR CROSS, CHUNCHAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, NEAR SILICON CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL, KONANAKUNTE VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK – 560 062 3. SRI SAMPANNA S/O SRI CHIKKA HANUMANTHAPPA AGE MAJOR Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:932 RFA No. 1081 of 2020 4. SRI S. LAKSHMANA S/O SRI SAMPANNA, AGE 55 YEARS SL.NO.3 AND 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO 29/1 ANJANAPURA MAIN ROAD KONANKUNTE, BENGALURU – 560 062 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.02.2020 PASSED IN OS.NO.17291/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE C/c. IV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,MAYOHALL UNIT, CITY CIVIL COURT, BENGALURU (CCH-21) DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal by the plaintiff in OS.No.17291/2006 is directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 10.02.2020 passed by the IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’ for short), whereby the said suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the respondents-defendants for permanent injunction and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:932 RFA No. 1081 of 2020 other reliefs in relation to the suit schedule immovable property was dismissed by the trial Court. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 jointly submit that during the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant instituted one more suit in OS No.2732/2022 against the respondents herein which was amicably settled before the Lok-Adalath vide award dated 24.07.2025. It is therefore submitted that nothing further survives in the present appeal and the same may be disposed of. It is also submitted that the documents produced by both sides in the present suit may be directed to be returned back to the parties. 4. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER i) Appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous in the light of the settlement arrived at between the appellant and respondents before the Lok Adalath in OS No. 2732/2022. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:932 RFA No. 1081 of 2020 ii) The Registry of this Court is directed to transmit all the TCRs back to the Trial Court immediately without any delay. iii) Immediately upon receipt of the TCRs, the Registry of the trial Court is directed to hand over and return all the documents produced by both parties i.e., Exs.P1 to P40 produced by the plaintiff and Exs.D1 to D19 produced by the defendants back to the defendants without any delay. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29