Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010429722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20038/2018 Between: 1. N. VENKATA RANGAM, N VENKATA RANGAM S/O RAJAYYA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, LECTURER IN HINDI VRS AND YRN COLLEGE, CHIRALA, RIO CHIRALA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. PRAKASAM 2. K RAGHUNADHA REDDY ,, S/O SIVARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WORKING AS LECTURER IN SANSKRIT, VRS AND YRN COLLEGE, CHIRALA, RIO CHIRALA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. Y KRISHNA MURTHY ,, S/O MALLIKHARJUNA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, LECTURER IN HISTORY, VRS AND YRN COLLEGE, CHIRALA, R O CHIRALA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. PVS CHOWDARY, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, WORKING AS LECTURER IN PHYSICS, VRS AND YRN COLLEGE, CHIRALA. R O KARAMCHEDU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. K SRIKNATH @ THATAIAH, S/O VASKABZWARLU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, LECTURER IN CLIEMISTRY, SIR CR REDDY COLLGE, ELURU, WE GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. Y SRINIVASA RAO ,, S/O LAKSHMINARAYANA. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, LECTURER IN COMMERCE, VRS AND YRN COLLEGE, 2 VS,J W.P.No.20038 of 2018 CHIRALA RIO KARAMCHEDU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDNICNION (CE) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTER THORICT GUNTUR 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEZIASE EDUCARION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJMUNWIN, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. VRS AND YRN COLLEGE, REP. BY ILL SUMMARY AND CORRESPONDENT, CHIRALA, PTAKASAM DISTRICT 4. SIR CR REDDY COLLEGE, REP.., BY ITS IN SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT. AIM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in not considering the representation dated 07-02-2018 for regularizing thier part time service with all consequential benefits on par with similarly situated lecturer in terms of G.O.Ms.NO.56 Higher Education (CE) Department dated 5-12-2014 as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitutution of India and consequently direct the Respondent to regularize Part time service of the petitioners with all consequential benefits on par with similarly situated lecturer in terms of G.O.Ms.No.56 Higher Education (CE) Department dated 5- 12-2014 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the representation dated 07-02-2018 in the light of Government orders in G.O.Ms.No.56 Higher Education (CE) Department dated 05-12-2014 and pass orders pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass 3 VS,J W.P.No.20038 of 2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order dated 18.06.2018 passed in I.A No. 1 of 2018 in W.P No. 20038 of 2018 and dismiss the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 4 VS,J W.P.No.20038 of 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following prayer: “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in not considering the representation dated 07-02-2018 for regularizing thier part time service with all consequential benefits on par with similarly situated lecturer in terms of G.O.Ms.NO.56 Higher Education (CE) Department dated 5-12-2014 as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent to regularize Part time service of the petitioners with all consequential benefits on par with similarly situated lecturer in terms of G.O.Ms.No.56 Higher Education (CE) Department dated 5-12-2014 and to pass” 2. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in considering the representation dated 07.02.2018 submitted by the petitioners, whereby they requested to regularize their part time services as lecturers with all consequential benefits on par with similarly situated lecturers in terms of G.O.Ms.No.56, Higher Education (CE) department, dated 05.12.2014, the present writ petition is filed. 3. When the writ petition came up for admission on 18.06.2018, this Court passed an interim order directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 07.02.2018 submitted by the petitioners, in the light of G.O.Ms.No.56, dated 05.12.2014 and to pass orders. 5 VS,J W.P.No.20038 of 2018 4. The 2nd respondent filed a detailed counter affidavit denying the averments of the petitioners and further stated that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, the respondents have considered the representations of the petitioners dated 07.02.2018 in accordance with law and their request was rejected vide proceedings bearing Rc.No.746/Admn.II/2018, dated 13.09.2019. Thus, requested to dismiss the writ petition. 5. Heard Mr. A. Rajendra Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education. 6. Perused the entire material available on record. It can be seen that pursuant to the interim orders passed by this Court, the respondent authorities have considered the representation submitted by the petitioners and their request was rejected vide proceedings dated 13.09.2019 of the 2nd respondent. 7. In view of the same, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are necessary in the present writ petition. However, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the proceedings dated 13.09.2019 passed by the 2nd respondent, if so advised. 8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 VS,J W.P.No.20038 of 2018 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 06.07.2026 Gss Whether the order is : Speaking Yes Reportable No