Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47441 (KAR)

SRI. B.H. SHIVANANDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11456/2024 · 2026-01-21

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3325 WP No. 11456 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 11456 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. B.H. SHIVANANDA, W/O LATE G HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O NO.124, BASAWANAPURA VIRGONAGAR POST, K R PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DANAPPA PRADHANAPPA PANIBHATE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER LAND TRIBUNAL Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3325 WP No. 11456 of 2024 BENGALURU NORTH SUB DVN KANDAYA BHAVAN BENGALURU-560009. 4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK K R PURAM BENGALURU-560049. 5. SMT VENKATAMMA W/O LATE NAGARAJAPPA 6. SMT G RAMYA D/O T GAJENDRA 7. SRI G LAVANYA D/O T GAJENDRA SL.NO.5 TO 7 ARE R/AT KAGGADASAPURA VILLAGE, C V RAMAN NAGAR, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SESHU.V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT OR ORDER TO THE R-1 TO 4 QUASH M.R NO. H6/2011-12 DTD 14.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE R-4 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, BANGALURE EAST TALUK, VIDE ANNEXUE-A QUASH ENDORSEMENT DTD 7/8-05- 2020 BEARING NO. RRT (KA.CR.132/19-20) ISSUED BY THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3325 WP No. 11456 of 2024 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, K.R PURAM VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondents No.1 to 4. Notice to other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons. 2. Learned High Court Government Pleader raises a preliminary objection that the prayer in the writ petition is to set aside a mutation order passed by the Tahsildar on 14.12.2011 in MR No.H6/2011-2012. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that such an order passed by the Tahsildar under Section 129 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act is an appealable order before the Assistant Commissioner in terms of Section 136 (2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3325 WP No. 11456 of 2024 3. Upholding the submissions of the learned High Court Government Pleader, the writ petition stands disposed of, while reserving liberty to the petitioner to File an appeal before the Assistant Commissioner invoking Section 136 (2) of the Act. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL