DURGA SORAN ALIAS DURGA SOREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./989/2026 · 2026-02-27
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4744 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4744 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5990
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 989 of 2026
---------
1. Durga Soran @ Durga Soren, aged about 23 years, son of Sri Mangal Soren, resident of Haludbani, Dungri Tola, P.O. & P.S. – Parsudih Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
2. Rajesh Murmu @ Rajesh Mahali @ Rakesh Murmu, aged about 26 years, son of Hemo Mahali, resident of H.No.-158, Jondragora, Line Tole, P.O. & P.S.- Sundernagar, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum.
....Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioners
: Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-27.02.2026
1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 238(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that four friends including the deceased went in the pond after drinking liquor and the victim drowned and the petitioners have been framed in this case. He further submits that charge-sheet dated 30.12.2025 has already been submitted and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedents and the petitioners for no offence have been languishing in custody since 04.12.2025; as such, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
5.
Having regard to the fact that the cause of death was due to drowning and the admitted fact is that apart from the victim, three other persons, after taking liquor went into the pond and the victim died due to drowning coupled with the fact that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedents and the petitioners are in custody since 04.12.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge these petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No. 127/2025.
6.
It is made clear that the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against these petitioners, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of these petitioners.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 27, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 28.02.2026