Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47437 (CAL)

MOHARUBA BEGUM v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/18603/2026 · 2026-10-07

Uday Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L – 75 07/10/2026 Court. No. 42 S.Kundu WPA 18603 of 2026 Moharuba Begum Vs. The Election of Commission of India & Ors. Md. A.R. Jaglul Kabir …for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the ECI. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is still pending before the District Election Officer, Murshidabad under adjudication. 2. The petitioner has made the representation before the respondent no. 4 but, till date, the representation has not been considered. 3. Learned counsel for the Election Commission of India submits that if a direction passed upon the DEO, he shall take appropriate step in accordance with law. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 5. The instant writ application is disposed of by directing the DEO, Murshidabad to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. 2 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Uday Kumar, J.)