[2026:RJ-JP:16116] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 713/2026 Mahaveer S/o Hemraj, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Brajnagar, Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kalyan Chand Surela For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 250/2024 registered at Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 103(1), 109(1), 118(1), 3(5) of BNS and 4/25 of Arms Act. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the injured witness, Narendar, has already been examined by the trial Court and in his statement, he has not made any specific allegation against the petitioner of causing sharp weapon injury. Narendar. He further submits that all the injuries sustained by the injured Narendar is found to be simple in nature. Counsel also submits that the other material witnesses, PW10-Murti Bai, and PW12-Pooja have also been examined and in their statements [2026:RJ-JP:16116] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-713/2026] also, there is no allegation against the accused-petitioner of causing any injury with the sword. He further submits that the fetal injury has been attributed to Hem Raj. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2024. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that there are specific allegations against the accused-petitioner of inflicting injuries with the sword to the injured, which is a sharp edged weapon. 5. On perusal of the post-mortem report of the deceased Lalit and so also injury report of injured Narendar, they said to have sustained the sharp weapon injuries. 6. On perusal of the first information report, there are specific allegations against the accused petitioner-Mahaveer, in making attack on the deceased-Lalit, and causing injury to the injured witness Narendar. 7. In the statement of PW 10-Murti Bai, it has been specifically stated that deceased Lalit was attacked by Mahaveer, Sonu, Hem Raj, Bhooli Bai and present petition-Mahaveer. The witness Pooja- PW12 has also specifically stated about the active involvement of the accused-petitioner in committing the offence, which resulted into death of the deceased, Lalit. 8. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also allegations against the accused-petitioner and his active involvement, in committing the offence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 9. Hence, this bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J NEERU/13