Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47423 (CAL)

ARINDAM PANDEY AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/19904/2025 · 2026-10-07

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.10.2026 Sl. No. 14 (DL) Ct.No.19 (Susanta) (Bench I.D. 266052) WPA 19904 of 2025 Arindam Pandey & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Swagata Datta, … for the Petitioners. 1. Affidavit of service as filed today on behalf of the writ petitioners is taken on record. 2. None appears on behalf of the respondent State and the private respondent despite service. 3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners submits before this Court that the writ petitioners are aggrieved on account of non- consideration of their representation dated 05.08.2025 by respondent no. 5 authority. 4. In view of such, this Court while disposing of the instant writ petition directs the respondent no. 5 authority to consider the representation of the writ petitioners in accordance with law and after giving an adequate opportunity of hearing both to the writ petitioners and the private respondent and/or any other stakeholder, shall pass a reasoned order and shall forthwith communicate the same to the writ petitioners, the private respondent and any other stakeholder, if there be any. 2 5. The entire exercise as indicated in the foregoing paragraph is to be completed positively within sixty working days from the date of communication of the server copy this order. 6. With the aforementioned observation, the WPA 19904 of 2025 is disposed of. (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)