Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47421 (KAR)

MR. M R DEEPAK v. THE AUTORIZED OFFICER

WP/11383/2025 · 2026-01-14

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2425 WP No. 11383 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 11383 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. M.R.DEEPAK S/O LATE SRI M.D.RAMA SHETTY D.NO. FF1, SGS HIGHLAND SACHIDANAND NAGAR BEML 5TH STAGE RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 098. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. PRIYA P., ADVOCATE) AND: THE AUTORIZED OFFICER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AT 1980, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE PLOT NO. 4, SECTOR 10, DWARKA NEW DELHI – 110 075 SADASHIVNAGAR BRANCH NO. 380, 13TH CROSS, SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 080 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER SRI PRASHANT KUMAR. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE AND RECALL THE ILLEGAL EX-PARTE ORDERS DATED 19-01-24, AS ANNEXURE NO. 1, AND THE FINAL ORDERS DATED 31-05-24, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2425 WP No. 11383 of 2025 PASSED BY HONBLE DRT-1, BANGALORE WITHOUT JURISDICTION, UNDER SEC 19 OF RDB ACT AND AS SUCH IT SHOULD BE TREATED AS A NULLITY, IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND THE GROUNDS LISTED IN THE OA, AS THE ORDERS ARE PASSED AFTER VERIFYING THE DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has moved a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL OF WRIT PETITION 1. The counsel for the petitioner submits that, without prejudice to any rights or remedies available under law, and without admitting any infirmity in the pleadings or cause of action, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition purely on account of strategic reconsideration. 2. This withdrawal is made voluntarily and shall not be construed as a waiver, abandonment, or concession on merits. The petitioner reserves liberty to pursue appropriate remedies as advised, in accordance with law. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the withdrawal of the above writ petition and pass such orders as deemed fit in the interest of justice.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2425 WP No. 11383 of 2025 In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3 CT:SS