- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5028 RSA No. 2067 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2067 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. MUDDABASAPPA @ T.S.BASAVARAJU, S/O SIDDARAMEGOWDA, R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK & DISTRICT-572118. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: SRI. SANGANABASAPPA, S/O LATE GURUCHANNABASAPPA, R/O THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMAKURU TQ., TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572118. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5028 RSA No. 2067 of 2018 ORAL ORDER When the matter is called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri.Sunil Kumar Patel., counsel for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 18.01.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again, the matter was listed on 30.07.2025, on that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Once again, the matter was listed on 20.11.2025, on that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect that the appeal is filed in 2018. Now we are in 2026. The appeal is pending for almost eight years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5028 RSA No. 2067 of 2018 representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE CH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22