2026:UHC:1408 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR No. 150 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. D.P. Mittal, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. with Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal and Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The instant criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist against the judgment and order dated 28.01.2026 passed by learned Special Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, rejecting the application moved by the revisionist under section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist argued that the learned court below committed gross illegality while rejecting the application and the material as placed before the court have not been properly dealt with. 5. He further submits that the court below while rejecting the applicant have not considered the mandate of section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023 and the order is apparently illegal. 6. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A., who accepts notice for respondent no. 1, submits that the learned court below after considering all the averment as made in the application preferred under section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023, and also after examining the police report rightly rejected the application since the application moved by the revisionist under section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023, is nothing but a counter blast of the FIR lodged by the other side. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the judgment passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, I do not find any perversity and illegality in the order under challenge, hence, there is no merit in the instant criminal revision and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 27.02.2026 2026:UHC:1408 PR