Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4740 (BOM)

PANKAJ MANILAL SHAH v. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/1469/2026 · 2026-08-25

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

906-WP-1469-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1469 OF 2026 Pankaj Manilal Shah … Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Anr. ... Respondents __________________________ Mr. Aditi Naikare for the Petitioner. Mr. Akshay P. Shinde for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. __________________________ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 25 th AUGUST, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Counsel for the Respondent. Learned Counsel for the Respondent opposed the Writ Petition. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that within a period of four weeks from today an application for regularization with all necessary documents shall be filed. After the application is filed, objections/deficiencies in the proposal be intimated to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks. The Petitioner to comply with the deficiencies within a period of four weeks thereafter. Within a period of four weeks Purti Parab 1/2 PURTI PRASAD PARAB Digitally signed by PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2026.08.28 11:33:10 +0530 906-WP-1469-2026.doc from the date when the deficiencies are removed, the application for regularization be decided in accordance with law. No coercive steps be taken against the Petitioner till the application for regularization is decided. 3. Writ Petition stands disposed of. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Purti Parab 2/2