Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47397 (CAL)

MOTIUR SHAIKH AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26548/2026 · 2026-10-07

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18. 18. 07.10.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 26548 OF 2026 MOTIUR SHAIKH AND ANOTHER VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Adv. Ms. Shrobana Sengupta, Adv. Ms. Sneha Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Kaushik Bandyopadhyay, Adv. … For Petitioners Mr. Nilanjan Pal, Adv. Mr. Sourav Sengupta, Adv. … For State 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioners is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioners submits that after filing of this writ petition though petitioner no.2 has been able to return back to her residence along with family members but petitioner no.1 is residing elsewhere. Petitioner no.2 is Karmadhyaksha of a Zila Parisad. Petitioner no.1 prays for direction upon the concerned police authority which would enable him to return back to his residence and also prayer is made for providing protection to both petitioners. 3. Prayer is also made on behalf of petitioners that if any FIR is registered against them, same may be intimated to them. 4. State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 5. Having considered the case made out in the writ petition Officer-in-Charge, Bakultala Police Station being respondent no.9 is directed to provide assistance [2] to petitioner no.1 which would enable petitioner no.1 to return back to his residence and to stay there with his family members. 6. In view of aforesaid submission, it appears that after filing of writ petition petitioner no.2 has been able to return back to her residence and stay there. 7. Respondent no.9 is also directed to provide protection to petitioners, if situation so arises. 8. Superintendent of Police, Diamond Harbour Police District being respondent no.8 is directed to intimate petitioners whether any FIRs are pending against them as on date along with necessary particulars by forwarding a letter to the petitioners by three (3) weeks from date. 9. Writ petition stands disposed of. 10. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)