Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47391 (CAL)

PADMA RANI PAUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/20632/2025 · 2026-10-07

Anuj Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L48 07.10.2026 Bpg. WPA No.20632 of 2025 Smt. Padma Rani Paul Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Achyut Basu Ms. Punam Basu Mr. Srikumar Chakraborty Ms. Sulagna Sen. …for the petitioner. 1. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that the private respondent nos.4 to 6 have deceived the petitioner and dishonestly induced her to part away with a sum of Rs.14 lakhs by way of cheque and cash, against purchase of a property being plot no.79, Block-F, Holding No.217/10/1, Post Office and Police Station-Kalyani, District-Nadia along with a building standing thereon. 3. The petitioner contends that despite receiving the said money, the private respondents did not transfer the said property and have also failed to refund the said money to the petitioner. The petitioner further contends that the petitioner has 2 been dishonestly cheated by the private respondents. 4. It appears that a demand notice dated 5th August, 2025 was addressed to the respondent no.4 with a copy thereof addressed to the Officer-in-Charge, Kalyani Police Station. 5. On query of the Court, it is submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that no formal complaint has been lodged with the local Police Station till date. 6. In such view of the matter, WPA 20632 of 2025 is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the Kalyani Police Station with a formal complaint, if at all advised. In the event, such complaint is made, the police shall take steps in accordance with law. 7. There will be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Anuj Singh, J.)