Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4738 (JHR)

M/S SAMARTH ENGINEERS THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, PRADEEP RAMBHAJI TAMBE @ PRADEEP TAMBE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1770/2026 · 2026-03-23

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8114 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1770 of 2026 ------ M/S. Samarth Engineers having their head office at Office No 201 Suraj Mahal Near Shivaji Statue Kothrud, Pune, Maharashtra 411038; and their Regional Office at H. No. 1, Kunwar Singh Colony, Hinoo, Airport Road P.O./P.S.: Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand- 834002 through its constituted power of attorney holder, Pradeep Rambhaji Tambe @ Pradeep Tambe, (aged about 37 years) S/O- Rambhaji Tambe, R/o- Barbhai road, Budruk, P.O.- Chinchapur, P.S- Sangamner, District Ahmednagar, Maharashtra 413736. Currently residing at H.No-01, Kunwar Singh Colony, Airport Road, Hinoo, P.O. & P.S.: Doranda, Distt: Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Nepal House, P.O./P.S.: Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand -834002 3. The Chief Engineer (CDO), Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Nepal House, P.O./P.S.: Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand -834002 4. The Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Division (Ranch West), Raja Rani Kothi, Near Nepal House, P.O./P.S.: Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand -834002. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpit Kumar, Advocate Ms. Apurba Banerjee, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Kumar, AAG-III. ------ 02/ 23rd March, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. There is nothing on record to show or even suggest that respondents had accepted/admitted any amount remaining due to the petitioner. The petitioner is showing several documents i.e. a contract and annexure-6A 2026:JHHC:8114 2 which according to me is not an admission of any amount which is due. 3. Thus, in absence of any admission this Court cannot issue any direction upon the respondents to pay any amount to the petitioner, specially when it is arising out of a contract. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. 5. The liberty is always reserved to petitioner to approach appropriate authority for the redressal of his grievance. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 23.03.2026 Amar/CP-2 Uploaded on:-25.03.2026