Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47350 (CAL)

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO LTD AND ANR v. SUBIR SAHA AND ANR

CO/1749/2026 · 2026-10-08

Aryak Dutt

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 Ct. No. 654 Sl. No. 07 Subadip CO 1749 of 2026 Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Ltd. & Anr. VS Sri Subir Saha & Anr. Ms. Reshmi Ghosh, Mr. Ranjit Singh, Mr. Amar Singh, Ms Putul Das Singh, Ms. Alivia Bhattacharjee. …for the petitioner 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the order dated 11th August, 2023 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal-II, Kolkata, in IA-968-2023 in connection with S.A. No. 616 of 2022. 2. The appeal was filed on 13th September, 2023. The petitioner has annexed the certified copy of the order to show that since 13th September, 2023 till date there has been no effective hearing of the appeal preferred by the petitioner. I am also informed that at present the Appellate Tribunal at Delhi is in-charge of Kolkata. The petitioner has, therefore, prayed that Misc. Appeal No. 22 of 2023 be disposed of as expeditiously as possible by the Appellate Tribunal at Delhi. 3. In view of the order sought for and proposed to be passed it is not necessary to direct the issuance of the notice upon the opposite parties. 2 However, the petitioner shall serve a copy of the petition along with this order on the opposite parties or its learned advocate before the tribunal. 4. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner. 5. The civil revisional application being C.O. 1749 of 2026 is disposed of. By requesting the Appellate Tribunal in-charge of learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal-II to dispose of the Misc. Appeal No. 22 of 2023 within a period of six months without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. (Aryak Dutt, J.)