Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 47346 (CAL)

MIR HOSSAIN @ MD MIR HOSSAIN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3419/2026 · 2026-10-08

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.10.2026 96 Ct. No. 37 S.D. Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3419 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 407 of 2026 dated 17.05.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh, Murshidabad. And In Re : Mr. Hossain @ Md. Mir Hossain ...… petitioner Mr. Tapodip Gupta Ms. Usashi Chattopadhyay …for the petitioner Mr. Subhasish Pachhal Mr. Ansuman Bera …for the State One person suffered injury in an incident of assault. One injury report shows that injured suffered simple injury while the other does not suggest so. Considering the nature of the incident and the involvement of the petitioner, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The petitioner shall appear on every date before the Jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance 2 of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) SUROJIT DAS Digitally signed by SUROJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.08 18:25:21 +05'30'